Preference-based Scores

Preference-based scores provide an overall summary of health-related quality of life on a common metric.

Preference-based scores summarize multiple domains on a metric ranging from 0 (as bad as dead) to 1 (perfect or ideal health). Scores can be used in comparisons across groups and for cost-utility analyses. For example, preference-based scores can help estimate the value of two treatments with different outcomes (see image below).

image for preferenc based page

Different Types of Summary Scores

Different approaches are used to create scores that summarize overall health-related quality of life. One strategy is to use a profile measure (e.g., the PROMIS-29). Profile measures assess multiple domains of health such as physical functioning, depression, and pain. Profile measures then provide multiple scores – one for each domain assessed. Each score provides information to understand health in detail and together, the scores provide a broader, more comprehensive description of health.

A second strategy is to use a preference-based score. A preference-based score begins with the assessment of multiple domains of health. However, unlike a profile, a preference-based score consists of a single number that ranges from 0 (“dead”) to 1 (“full health”). This score quantifies the value that individuals place on different states of health. Preference-based scores represent explicit trade-offs between different levels of health in different domains. Preference-based scores can be used in cost-utility analyses and to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The images below show examples of their use.

 

utility score image vertical line utility score image line graph

Multiple methods are used to construct preference-based scores including time tradeoff, standard gamble, and others (e.g., discrete choice). Scores are based on preferences for different health states (i.e., different combinations of health profile scores) and are developed with a nationally-representative sample.

The standard gamble method is also used to create utility scores. Utility scores are useful in cost-effectiveness analyses.

Both profile and preference-based scores are important in monitoring the health outcomes of individuals and groups. It is important to note that preference-based scores are not reflective of preferences for an individual patient and should not be used for individual care decision making.

PROMIS-Preference (PROPr) Score

The PROMIS-Preference (PROPr) score is a generic, societal, preference-based summary score that has demonstrated validity (see Hanmer 2018).  It is based on PROMIS scores for Cognition (Cognitive Function or Cognitive Function Abilities), Depression, Fatigue, Pain Interference, Physical Function, Sleep Disturbance, and Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities. Learn more >>

PROPr Requires 7 PROMIS Domains

An analyst can calculate a PROPr score with scores from 7 PROMIS domains. There are three options for obtaining the necessary data:

1. Administer computer adaptive tests (CATs) for:

  • PROMIS Cognitive Function v2.0 or Cognitive Function – Abilities v2.0
  • PROMIS Depression v1.0
  • PROMIS Fatigue v1.0
  • PROMIS Pain Interference v1.0 or v1.1
  • PROMIS Physical Function v1.0, v1.1, v1.2 or v2.0
  • PROMIS Sleep Disturbance v1.0
  • PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities v2.0

2. Administer the PROMIS-20+2 Profile v2.1 (PROPr). This is the PROMIS-29 Profile v2.1 and two items from Cognitive Function – Abilities v2.0

  • PC6r: In the past 7 days, I have been able to concentrate. 1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=Very much
  • PC27r: In the past 7 days, I have been able to remember to do things, like take medicine or buy something I needed. 1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=Very much

3. Administer the PROMIS-29 Profile v2.1 and a PROMIS Cognitive Function – Abilities or PROMIS Cognitive Function short form (e.g., 4a).

The PROMIS-Preference score was constructed using the Cognitive Function - Abilities Subset v2.0 Item Bank. To get a cognition estimate to calculate a PROPr score, you can either use Cognitive Function - Abilities Subset v2.0 or Cognitive Function v2.0. Since both measures are co-calibrated using IRT, their scores are comparable.

Access PROPr Scoring Software Code

PROPr is calculated from the scores for the 7 PROMIS domains. PROMIS domain scores can be calculated using the HealthMeasures Scoring Service.  The HealthMeasures Scoring Service export includes PROMIS T-scores and theta values. For PROPr, you will use the theta values.  See Scoring Instructions for more information>>

Once you have theta scores, apply SAS or R code to calculate a PROPr score. The code is named “MAUT” (Multi-Attribute Utility Theory) and available at https://github.com/janelhanmer/PROPr

Other PROMIS Preference-based Summary Scores

EQ-5D preference-based health index scores can be estimated from the PROMIS Global Health scale. To learn more, see Thompson et al et al (2017). Scoring instructions are included in the PROMIS Global Scoring Manual.

Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI-3) preference scores can be estimated from the PROMIS-29 v2.0 Profile (preferred) or PROMIS Global Health scale. For more information and scoring equations, see Hays et al (2016).

Neuro-QoL™ Preference-based Score

A preference-based score from Neuro-QoL cognitive function, depression, fatigue, mobility, upper extremity function, and ability to participate in social roles and activities measures is in development in 2019.